What. The. Fuck?
If they want to use these standards for their argument… they’re going to have to make male masturbation illegal because technically by these terms, those are conscious abortions (and a sin!) too. But NOOO it is all about controlling a woman’s body. Whether you’re prolife or prochoice this isÂ ridiculous.
So technically I’m pregnant right now? UM NO. This time you can’t bend science to fit your agenda. A fetus happens when sperm meets egg… not before. Doctors make guesses according to a woman’s cycle and when the couple has had sex. This isn’t evolutionary theory, it is fact! We didn’t shake hands before we shook hands. We aren’t full before we eat. Conception happens at CONCEPTION.
And Arizona, really? I expect this out of the Bible Belt. Tisk, tisk.
Want to keep with your prolife agenda and make this about banning abortions? Well- at least you have a “rational argument” that I choose to disagree with. But this? This is something else.
A new bill up for vote in the state of Arizona would ban abortions for some expectant mothers, but thatâ€™s only the start of what lawmakers have in store. If the legislation passes, the state will consider a child to exist even before conception.
Under Arizonaâ€™s H.B. 2036, the state would recognize the start of the unborn childâ€™s life to be the first day of its motherâ€™s last menstrual period. The legislation is being proposed so that lawmakers can outlaw abortions on fetuses past the age of 20-weeks, but the verbiage its authors use to construct a time cycle for the baby would mean that the start of the child’s life could very well occur up to two weeks before the mother and father even ponder procreating.
On a related noted, check out this article on the unsung birth control hero Bill Bairid.